In September 2023, an incident in Chiang Mai drew national attention. A British tourist accused children from a hill tribe of stealing her watch on the grounds of one of Thailand’s most revered temples — Doi Suthep. The story sparked outrage on social media and in the press, raising ethical concerns about the popular photo sessions with traditionally dressed children.
How it began
At Wat Phra That Doi Suthep, visited daily by hundreds of tourists, it had long been common to see young girls in traditional attire. For a small fee, they willingly posed for photos. Many saw it as a harmless part of local culture. But in September, everything changed.
After her visit, the British tourist discovered her watch was missing. Back home, she reviewed her photos and noticed one image showing a girl reaching toward her wrist. She posted the photo on Facebook, and soon local media, including Krobkruakao, picked up the story.
Public reaction and consequences
The post triggered widespread public debate. Online commenters were divided — some demanded punishment, others questioned the children’s guilt. Local authorities reacted swiftly: the children vanished from the temple grounds the next day. No official statement was issued about their whereabouts, but their presence at Doi Suthep ended abruptly.
The incident damaged the temple’s reputation. Doi Suthep is not just a tourist site but a sacred place for Thais, and such scandals are seen as desecration. Chiang Mai officials called for a review of practices involving children in tourism, especially at religious sites.
What happened next
Despite the media storm, no formal charges were filed. The temple resumed operations, but monitoring of commercial activities on its grounds was tightened. Tourists are now advised to keep their belongings secure and avoid participating in “photo attractions,” especially those involving children.
The watch incident became a catalyst for a broader discussion on the dark side of tourism: when traditions become commercialized, and children become tools for profit. Many now ask: is this innocent entertainment — or a form of exploitation?
Back to list
